Mercury vapor air-surface exchange measured by collocated micrometeorological and enclosure methods - Part II: Bias and uncertainty analysis | |
W Zhu; J Sommar![]() ![]() | |
2015 | |
Source Publication | Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics
![]() |
Volume | 15Issue:4Pages:5359-5376 |
Abstract | Dynamic flux chambers (DFCs) and micrometeorological (MM) methods are extensively deployed for gauging air-surface Hg-0 gas exchange. However, a systematic evaluation of the precision of the contemporary Hg-0 flux quantification methods is not available. In this study, the uncertainty in Hg-0 flux measured by the relaxed eddy accumulation (REA) method, the aerodynamic gradient method (AGM), the modified Bowen ratio (MBR) method, as well as DFC of traditional (TDFC) and novel (NDFC) designs, are assessed using a robust data set from two field intercomparison campaigns. The absolute precision in Hg-0 concentration difference (Delta C) measurements is estimated at 0.064 ng m(-3) for the gradient-based MBR and AGM systems. For the REA system, the parameter is Hg-0 concentration (C) dependent at 0.069 + 0.022C. During the campaigns, 57 and 62% of the individual vertical gradient measurements are found to be significantly different from 0, while for the REA technique, the percentage of significant observations is lower. For the chambers, non-significant fluxes are confined to a few night-time periods with varying ambient Hg-0 concentrations. Relative bias for DFC-derived fluxes is estimated to be similar to +/- 10, and similar to 85% of the flux bias is within +/- 2 ng m(-2) h(-1) in absolute terms. The DFC flux bias follows a diurnal cycle, which is largely affected by the forced temperature and irradiation bias in the chambers. Due to contrasting prevailing micrometeorological conditions, the relative uncertainty (median) in turbulent exchange parameters differs by nearly a factor of 2 between the campaigns, while that in Delta C measurement is fairly consistent. The estimated flux uncertainties for the triad of MM techniques are 16-27, 12-23 and 19-31% (interquartile range) for the AGM, MBR and REA methods, respectively. This study indicates that flux-gradient-based techniques (MBR and AGM) are preferable to REA in quantifying Hg-0 flux over ecosystems with low vegetation height. A limitation of all Hg-0 flux measurement systems investigated is their inability to obtain synchronous samples for the calculation of 1 C. This reduces the precision of flux quantification, particularly in the MM systems under non-stationarity of ambient Hg-0 concentration. For future applications, it is recommended to accomplish Delta C derivation from simultaneous collected samples. |
Keyword | Biochemistry Biomedical Electronics Biosensors Chemical Sensors Electrochemical Electrodes Digestive Enzymes / Electrochemical Three-electrode System Freeze-dried Enzyme Substrate Ingestible Microsystem Integrated Automatic Ph-stats |
Subject Area | 环境地球化学 |
Indexed By | SCI |
Language | 英语 |
Document Type | 期刊论文 |
Identifier | http://ir.gyig.ac.cn/handle/352002/5927 |
Collection | 环境地球化学国家重点实验室_环境地球化学国家重点实验室_期刊论文 环境地球化学国家重点实验室 |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | W Zhu,J Sommar,CJ Lin,et al. Mercury vapor air-surface exchange measured by collocated micrometeorological and enclosure methods - Part II: Bias and uncertainty analysis[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics,2015,15(4):5359-5376. |
APA | W Zhu,J Sommar,CJ Lin,&X Feng.(2015).Mercury vapor air-surface exchange measured by collocated micrometeorological and enclosure methods - Part II: Bias and uncertainty analysis.Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics,15(4),5359-5376. |
MLA | W Zhu,et al."Mercury vapor air-surface exchange measured by collocated micrometeorological and enclosure methods - Part II: Bias and uncertainty analysis".Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics 15.4(2015):5359-5376. |
Files in This Item: | Download All | |||||
File Name/Size | DocType | Version | Access | License | ||
Mercury vapor air-su(4968KB) | 开放获取 | License | View Download |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment